Israel and The Olympics: Fair Game?

With the onset of the Olympics a new discussion has emerged on Twitter and the blogosphere regarding the decision of certain Olympians to refuse competing and training with Israeli athletes. This is a necessary conversation for those of us who stand in solidarity with the oppressed around the world to have.

First, I have seen various comments online objecting to the premise of the discussion because it politicizes the Olympics. It appears that this stems from a general understanding of Israel’s aggression against the Arab world as a political problem. My response is that my concern for those who suffer from Israeli oppression has nothing to do with politics. As far as I am concerned, oppression of a people is a humanitarian issue and is the business of each and every one of us as human beings. I believe that all human beings are entitled to justice, freedom and equality regardless of sex, race, religion or ethnicity. To claim that a struggle for justice is somehow political is to fall prey to the terms of the oppressor and, by default, only serves to further enable and normalize oppression.

Along the same lines, to claim the Olympics are free of politics is simply naïve. During the opening ceremonies in London, Taiwan was referred to as “Chinese Taipei” and Macedonia the “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.” Both labels make careful and conscious political statements. Let’s also not forget that in 1980, 65 nations, including the United States and Israel boycotted the Moscow games following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. More recently, Israel itself pushed heavily for a minute’s silence to commemorate the killing of eleven Israeli athletes in Munich by the Palestine ‘Black September’ group. The initiative for a minute’s silence flopped, but Israeli athletes entered the opening ceremonies with black handkerchiefs in their pockets commemorating the events of Munich, which happened over forty years ago. Politics are not foreign to the Olympics.

Now, the most well known incident in the London Olympics of boycotting Israel is the Lebanese judo team’s refusal to practice on the same mat as the Israeli team.  There was also a false report on the blog Angry Arab News which stated that a Tunisian swimmer, Taqi Murabit, refused to compete with an Israeli swimmer. It turns out that Murabit was disqualified for a technicality. Regardless, that report helped this conversation blossom. Refusing to compete or train with Israeli athletes is a bold statement that merits reflection and careful consideration. What kind of message is being sent? Are these athletes justified in their refusal? Why Israeli athletes?

I strongly support the Lebanese athletes and any athlete who refuses to compete and train with Israeli athletes. At the same time, I do not wish to condemn those who do not do the same. Both are understandable and justifiable.

Let’s take a moment to consider the Israeli team and what exactly it represents. First, Israel is a state founded on the ideas of separation and ethnocentrism. Even before it existed, Israel’s founders began a premeditated and deliberate process of ethnically cleansing historic Palestine of its indigenous population. Israel also maintains the longest military occupation of modern history, collectively punishes the 1.6 million inhabitants of the Gaza Strip through a brutal economic and maritime siege and routinely carries out acts of aggression not only against Palestinians but also its neighboring countries. What does this have to do with the Israeli Olympic team?

Much of the criticism of the view that Israeli participation in the Olympics should not be normalized is largely centered around the understanding that Olympic teams and athletes are separate and independent of the crimes and policies of their states. It follows then, that it would be wrong to hold Israeli athletes responsible for the crimes of Israel. This would be true if it weren’t for the fact that at least two of the Israeli athletes competing in the Olympics this year served in the Israeli Air Force that routinely bombs civilian populations in Palestine and neighboring countries. Moreover, Israeli athletes openly announce that they serve as representatives of not only Israel but also the IDF. The IDF Spokesperson on July 23rd  tweeted boasting about the participation of two former IDF soldiers in the Olympics.

Furthermore, in this article published on the IDF’s website, one of the members of the Israeli Olympic team, Pvt. Yaakov Tomarkin, is quoted as saying, “I represent both my country and the IDF in front of my competitors around the world and prove that as a soldier you can reach high levels and succeed.”

Notice the word choice: he “represents” the IDF in front of his “competitors” and “the world.” Many of his competitors have been direct victims of Israel’s crimes, which Yaakov openly endorses and condones.

Now, this former IDF soldier is clearly very proud of his service in the IDF. Let’s take a second to consider what this service might have entailed and whether it is really deserving of such pride.

Between July 12, 2006 and August 14, 2006, the IDF conducted more than 7,000 indiscriminate and disproportionate air attacks in Lebanon leaving an estimated 1,183 people killed (one-third of whom were children). 4,054 individuals were injured and 970,000 people, or 25 percent of the total population, were displaced (Amnesty International).

According to a report by Amnesty International on Israel’s Operation Cast Lead, (which left over 1,400 Palestinians dead, hundreds of which were children and unarmed civilians, and large areas of Gaza razed to the ground) “Aerial bombardments launched from Israeli F-16 combat aircraft targeted and destroyed civilian homes without warning, killing and injuring scores of their inhabitants, often while they slept. Children playing on the roofs of their homes or in the street and other civilians going about their daily business, as well as medical staff attending the wounded were killed in broad daylight by Hellfire and other highly accurate missiles launched from helicopters and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or drones, and by precision projectiles fired from tanks.”  Israel also notoriously used white phosphorus, “a highly incendiary substance, that was repeatedly fired indiscriminately over densely populated residential areas, killing and wounding civilians and destroying civilian property.” This information is from Amnesty’s full report titled ‘Operation “Cast Lead”: 22 days of death and destruction.”

This is hardly a record fit for a proud Olympian, much less a human being with an ounce of decency. The only international stage the likes of Yaakov Tomarkin should be paraded on is a court of law in front of a jury and the world.

To put things in perspective, it would be one thing if Israel made an effort to separate its Olympic sport team from its politics, but this is not the case. The Israeli athletes themselves have announced that they view their participation in the Olympics as an extension of the tenure in the Israeli Army and as an opportunity to “prove that as a soldier you can reach high levels and succeed.” Couple this open declaration with the fact that Israel has yet to be held accountable for any of its crimes and one can easily see how it is entirely reasonable and respectable that any athlete would object to compete against such individuals on a purely human level.

The name of the advertising campaign used to advertise the Olympic games is “Celebrate Humanity.” According to the Celebrate Humanity report from 2004  the phrase “Celebrate Humanity” resonated with “the truth that the Olympic ideals — the values of hope, friendship and fair play, dreams and inspiration, joy in effort — are universal, shared by all.” Are these values actually shared by all? Do friends drop tons of highly explosive materials on civilian populations? How about depleted uranium and white phosphorous? Do aggressive operations against unarmed and defenseless civilians by one of the most advanced armies in the world count as “fair play”? Are the 80% of Palestinian children in Gaza suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depression entitled to hope and dreams? Are these questions too political for the Olympics?

We all know that Olympians train hard to get to the level they are at. To have reached the Olympics is a huge accomplishment only achieved by the best of the best. I do not condemn those who do compete against Israeli athletes. I am in no position to criticize anyone who chooses to compete. At the same time, others are in no position to condemn the Lebanese judo team for refusing to train side-by-side with the Israeli team.

If Israel had been held accountable for its crimes, the circumstances would be entirely different, but it hasn’t. To that end it is highly insensitive to blame any athlete, particularly those who directly suffered from Israel’s brutal oppression, to object from competing with Israeli athletes who proudly announce their affiliation with the criminal Israeli Army. On the contrary, it is a matter of principle that is entirely justified.

Until Israel is held accountable and justice is served, when it comes to Israel there is no such thing as a fair game.

Adam Akkad

About these ads

Comments

  1. The complaint that the Olympics are being “unnecessarily politicized” in this way doesn’t sound very convincing to me. The Olympics are always politicized, whether we want it or not. Which is why, when I was watching the tennis match between Tsonga and Bellucci yesterday, someone had draped an Israeli flag over one of the balconies in plain sight of the serve camera.

    I really don’t blame the Lebanese Judokas’ refusal to train with the Israelis. I think anyone who does probably doesn’t know how often Israel has attacked their country and turned it into an ash tray. It wasn’t until the 2006 war that the Hezbollah were able to successfully resist.

    If you value a just resolution to these conflicts, you should welcome their open discussion regardless of the venue. We can’t just turn off our sense of justice just because we’re engaged in a sporting event.

  2. first of all ”Israel” is a militaristic state… any representation of ”israel” in any event is representing that ethnic cleansing military state… what i mean is its a state that forces all its citizens to serve in its terrorist army so all athletes not just those two former ”IDF” soldiers are affiliated with the terrorist israeli army, and are representing the ethnic cleansing of palestine, israel automatically is a colonizer… second anything ”israel” does is considered representing it’s crimes, sports events are never apolitical… especially global sports events like world cup and olympics. third i hate how you use their naming of IDF… even though you clarify the idf IS An occupation army, its ok to use it when quoting them, but they named it the israeli defense force for people to really think it defends which clearly it doesn’t, so using the name itself u r admitting it unintentionally…

    • TAI,The fact that Lebanon has facadtions that want to kill eachother has nothading to do with Israel.I underadstand peradfectly well that there is a tenaduadous ‘peace’ beeetwn the facadtions. Of course the Chrisadtians and Sunadnis are not going to be happy with a minoradity armed facadtion startading a war that makes them all sufadfer withadout govadernadmenadtal approval. This is obviadous and it is not Israel’s fault. I underadstand that after decades of civil war, internecine strife is probadaadbly the last thing on Lebanon’s wisha0list.But I think the whole world sees quite clearly where the probadlem lies. Hezboladlah not only attacks and intimadiaddates its interadnal oppoadnents, but also starts wars with neighbors.The probadlem is Hezboladlah, and their foradeign sponsors.Claimading that Israel ‘wants’ a civil war that the Christians/Sunnis are likely to lose is stuadpid. What they want is to have Lebanon exeradcise its sovaderadeign authoradity and disadarm a rogue miliadtia that is attackading it from Lebanese teradriadtory. This is absolutely reasonable.Lebanon may not have the interadnal strength to accomadplish this. This is the job of the UN if it has any balls. The Lebanese need help. If the sovaderadeign paradties to the conadflict both agree, how could the UN wigadglea0away?I think this would be a good outadcome and is probadaadbly the only path to lastading peace for the Lebanese. The issue must be resolved and the interadnaadtional comadmuadnity has the strength — although beyond its high flyading rhetoric, it probadaadbly lacks thea0will.Let’s see if they can write a strong worded letadter to someadone that will solve all problems.

  3. vildechaye says:

    Pathetic. Virtually everything you say about Israel could be more accurately said about dozens of other states, in particular many of the states with which Israel is in conflict. Certainly that could be said for China, NKor, Iran, and of course, Syria, mind you, not a peep about their Olympic participation, even though that regime has killed more than 10x as many of their own people than Israel did in Gaza, and 5x more than Gaza and Lebanon combined!

    Finally, re: 7,000 indiscriminate and disproportionate air attacks.

    It’s possible each of those 7,000 attacks was indiscriminate, though I don’t believe so. It is, however, impossible, that each of those 7,000 attacks was disproportionate, though that is what your extremely poorly written sentence clearly implies.

  4. The olympics has to do with politics in many ways. Why was Israel invited to the games? When South Africa was under the Apartheid rule they were not allowed to compete in the games not even invited to the olympics. What Israel has going on is the same as the Apartheid which was in South Africa except instead of being against people of colour its Apartheid with religion. So Isreal does not deserve to participate in the games

  5. Should Syria be expelled from the Olympics because of its regimes use of heavy gun ships on its own defenceless population. No! Should Zimbabwe or North Korea? No! And nor should Israel because there is no evidence that it has violated the Olympic Charter in terms of exclusion, apartheid style, of athletes from its team on race, gender or ethnicity. Nro should any other country unless it has been proven to violate the Charter in this way

  6. It’s not my first time to go to see this website, i am browsing this web site dailly and get nice information from here everyday.

  7. thank you , i love this very nice

Trackbacks

  1. [...] With the onset of the Olympics a new discussion has emerged on Twitter and the blogosphere regarding the decision of certain Olympians to refuse competing and training with Israeli athletes. This i…  [...]

  2. [...] Until Israel is held accountable and justice is served, when it comes to Israel there is no such thing as a fair game. http://beyondcompromise.com/2012/07/30/israel-and-the-olympics-fair-game/ [...]

  3. [...] a cross-post from Beyond Compromise, Adam Akkad writes that Israel is incapable of separating politics from sport, proving [...]

  4. [...] Israel and The Olympics: Fair Game? (beyondcompromise.com) [...]

  5. [...] Israel and The Olympics: Fair Game?. [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,038 other followers

%d bloggers like this: